| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Biff

Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 439
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:42 pm Post subject: An offer we can't refuse. |
|
|
| Peter Severn wrote: |
Mr. Stone & Mr. Jorgenson,
Forgive me the rudeness of including both of you in this conversation, but
given who you represent, and who I represent, and the situation at hand? A
small bit of expediency did not seem inappropriate. I had always hoped to
shelter the Sentries from the things they could never understand, but it
seems a newer and more inquisitive generation now inhabits the Outpost.
However fond I might be of my days with the Sentries, I must temper that
with a practical acknowledgement that I'm not sure if I can even trust you.
Let us for a moment consider the possibility that we could learn to trust
each other. Forsythe Security has had affiliates in the past. Some of those
affiliates even find themselves advancing within the framework of the parent
company (so to speak). The best affiliates, I find, are those who already
have a selfless motivation: vengeance might not be the most erudite of those
ambitions, but it certainly suffices. One can always find new outrages to
stoke the fires of vengeful thinking, at least in my line of work. I imagine
if you asked any Forsythe employee how they came to their positions, you'd
find some similar motivation.
I've given quite a bit of thought to how we might prove our trustworthiness
to each other. It seems, perhaps, that the best bonds might be those that
show our common motivations. To that end, I'd like to suggest a series of
quid pro quo exchanges. I have in mind some specific opportunities, but I'm
not beyond a small amount of negotiation. After all, the goal here is to
establish trust.
We might start with prudence. For those of us who don't believe in
providence, it is a more practical building block of trust. Prudence, for
example, would worry that you continue to make one of your own a target by
having them hold dangerous property that doesn't belong to them. Forsythe
could be of some assistance in taking that problem off of your hands. But
what might be an appropriate exchange?
Back in September, I became curious about what the magician thought he had
discovered. He always was such a bright one, it seemed there might be
insight hiding there. Fortunately, I make new friends easily, although I
imagine this new friend might have been chastised for losing a patient's
medical file. Psychiatric nurses are supposed to show more prudence, after
all. I'm not sure that his answers will be what you expect, nor do they
necessarily cast a flattering light on all of us. Sadly, Bryce seems to have
regressed more than advanced through arcana. Trust requires you come to your
own decisions on that matter, though, even though prudence never was one of
Pandora's strengths.
This seems a perfect opportunity for our first step of trust together. We're
both essentially done with these items. Neither of them actually even belong
to us, they are little more than the fragmented and insane ramblings of
their original owners. We can easily understand, though, why the other might
be interested in seeing that for themselves. A trussed swan for a pile of
dead doves. This might lead to cats, dogs, men and worse if we find each
step of our trust supported by prudent action from the other. We might even
end up going hunting together one day, many of you have already shown an
interest in wilderness adventuring.
Send my best regards to the Sentries and my cautious anticipation of a
successful affiliation. Forsythe affiliates find many advantages, since we
are able to extend to them a measure our protection even as they become part
of the team protecting others. If you've read anything about our Greenbrier
facilities, you'll know that protection anticipates even the end of all
things. If we're masters of anything at Forsythe Security, it is prudence.
I await your thoughts.
Sincerely,
Peter Severn
CEO, Forsythe Security
http://www.forsythesecurity.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Obtusitivity

Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 585 Location: Santa Rosa, CA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know this seems to be a bandwagon that i'm always on, but i think we should seriously consider this. The hard drive is of limited use to us now, since we've already scraped every bit of info we could find out of it -- at the same time, having some insight into what bryce was working on might open new avenues of investigation -- something i think we can all agree we desperately need.
So cast my lot w/ the Forsythe "Little Brother" program for now -- The worst that can happen is we lose the HD , which we've already backed up.
What do the rest of you think?
Obs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Varin

Joined: 20 Apr 2007 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm with you Obs. We lose nothing by giving away the physical drive.
| Quote: |
| We might even end up going hunting together one day, many of you have already shown an interest in wilderness adventuring. |
Although his choice of words sure doesn't make me feel all warm and fuzzy inside...
| Quote: |
| A trussed swan for a pile of dead doves. |
_________________ "It's something else. It's very big and it lives somewhere in the deep dark depths of the ocean. And it goes bloop." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dante

Joined: 20 Apr 2007 Posts: 578 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is a negotiation, remember?
I'd like to know a little bit more about why Mr. Severn wants the trussed swan.
I think that our counter-offer should be to give him online access to the contents of the drive, as already posted on the wiki, rather than the physical harddrive itself.
a) if he balks, this may be because for some reason having the real thing is important to him. If so, it seems important to know why? Ritualistic purposes?
b) or he may complain that he has no way of knowing if we've uploaded everything, but then we can just point out that he has to trust us as much as we have to trust him in this transaction.
c) or he may be content with just having the directory contents like that, in which case we haven't lost anything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Obtusitivity

Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 585 Location: Santa Rosa, CA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That sounds perfectly reasonable actually -- i was expecting to have to bitch alot more.
But i think the wiki's a bad idea -- let's choose some 3rd party neutral location to upload the contents of the drive to, tell him the location, and then see how he reacts.
If he takes it, the deal's a "go", and it looks like he was interested in the content
If he demands the physical drive, then the drive itself is somehow important..., and we look for a next move.
Is that what you're saying Dante? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jjason

Joined: 21 Apr 2007 Posts: 424 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like Dante's idea. If Peter wants to the physical disk instead of the data, that's certainly a clue to his intents.
Something else that's been bothering me - If Foresythe wants the disk, why didn't Art just take it? Art got there before us - he could've taken it no problem. _________________ WHO IS SAINT FENLINE?
"We remain convinced that this is the best defensive posture to adopt in order to minimize casualties when the Great Old Ones return from beyond the stars to eat our brains." - from The Concrete Jungle by Charles Stross |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Varin

Joined: 20 Apr 2007 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We could just ask him if he needs the physical drive or if we can just send him the files. Let him tell us exactly what he needs. No need to challenge him and blow away our chance off the bat. _________________ "It's something else. It's very big and it lives somewhere in the deep dark depths of the ocean. And it goes bloop." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unknown Quantity

Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Posts: 287 Location: NOT HERE
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
See if you can get 'ole Uncle Peter to throw in a few pizzas. ^.^
Seriously, though, I say give it to him. We've already milked that thing dry, as far what we can get out of it. We know it's full of some strong juju... But none of us here has the mystical wherewithal, or the technical gadgetry, to get much more than we already have (and if we did, would we really want to mess with it?). Maybe they can do their CSI thing on it and see something we can’t. NOTE: For that they’d need the physical drive; I doubt Pete will go for a copy of the drive’s contents. At any rate, it’s always useful to have the perspective provided by a second set of eyes (especially when those eyes can double as a nice long pointy stick). The only thing we really have to loose by giving it to him is if he's one of the Bad Guys (TM), and I think we've already established that Forsythe != Choraz. Besides, if we dick around with him too much there's always a chance that he'll take his ball and go home. Or come take the drive by force. Either way, we definitely loose.
Besides, I'm bored... I could use something new to digest. _________________ "A sword by itself rules nothing. It only comes alive in skilled hands." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James Stone

Joined: 06 May 2007 Posts: 138 Location: Bloody freezing in the North East
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yey, just finished work to find that lovely email from Peter. I would agree to the exchange. As it is the first step of a trust exercise the gains by either party are marginal, so not a great deal can be gained by pushing the negotiation, but it is worth a mild poke. _________________ Run, flee, reject reality, try and outrace every eventuality, to emerge and purge any alternative urges that come.....Do you know where you're drumming from? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jjason

Joined: 21 Apr 2007 Posts: 424 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's been suggested that we give him the files first and only give him the physical hard drive if he asks for it, an idea which I support. That way we can get more information about what exactly he wants plus we can go ahead with that plan immediately - James or Biff just needs to e-mail him the archive file version of the directory.
I severely doubt that he's going to pack up and go home if we push a little - he's stated that he's willing to negotiate and he obviously needs something from us - otherwise he'd just go on ignoring us and our questions like he was doing so far. I'm totally on board with going ahead with this but I think we should be careful and get anything on Peter that we can get. Just because Foresythe ain't Chorazos doesn't mean they have our interests in mind. _________________ WHO IS SAINT FENLINE?
"We remain convinced that this is the best defensive posture to adopt in order to minimize casualties when the Great Old Ones return from beyond the stars to eat our brains." - from The Concrete Jungle by Charles Stross |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Konamouse

Joined: 20 Apr 2007 Posts: 142 Location: Las Vegas
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But what can he offer us in exchange that makes it worthwhile and gives us some idea of potential trust? _________________ 'squeek' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unknown Quantity

Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Posts: 287 Location: NOT HERE
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jjason wrote: |
| It's been suggested that we give him the files first and only give him the physical hard drive if he asks for it, an idea which I support. |
| Peety wrote: |
| Prudence, for example, would worry that you continue to make one of your own a target by having them hold dangerous property that doesn't belong to them. |
Sounds to me as if he's asking for the drive by name. But I may be reading too much into it...
| Jjason wrote: |
| I severely doubt that he's going to pack up and go home if we push a little - he's stated that he's willing to negotiate and he obviously needs something from us - otherwise he'd just go on ignoring us and our questions like he was doing so far. |
Perhaps, but keep in mind he's been at this a lot longer than we have. If we try to pull a fast one on him, or anything tricky like that, and he's liable to see right through it. In that event, things could get messy fast. I, for one, don't see why you're so insistant on hanging onto that thing. If it were me, it'd be at the bottom of a very deep lake (or similarly inaccessable place) right about now. _________________ "A sword by itself rules nothing. It only comes alive in skilled hands." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WolfHawk Moderator
Joined: 20 Apr 2007 Posts: 467 Location: Midwest USA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Konamouse wrote: |
| But what can he offer us in exchange that makes it worthwhile and gives us some idea of potential trust? |
It sounds like they managed to "question" Bryce who is, as far as we know, still locked up in the looney bin.
| Biff wrote: |
| Peter Severn wrote: |
But what might be an appropriate exchange?
Back in September, I became curious about what the magician thought he had
discovered. He always was such a bright one, it seemed there might be
insight hiding there. Fortunately, I make new friends easily, although I
imagine this new friend might have been chastised for losing a patient's
medical file. Psychiatric nurses are supposed to show more prudence, after
all. I'm not sure that his answers will be what you expect, nor do they
necessarily cast a flattering light on all of us. Sadly, Bryce seems to have
regressed more than advanced through arcana. Trust requires you come to your
own decisions on that matter, though, even though prudence never was one of
Pandora's strengths. |
|
What Bryce discovered could be very valuable to us. Not to mention the fact that he is one of the very few remaining original Sentires and it would be nice to hear what he had to say garbled or not.
I agree with offering the files first. The actual drive itself would only be worthwhile for a. recovering information we couldn't due to file erasures etc. or b. forensic evidence. _________________ Having abandoned my search for the truth I am now looking for a good fantasy.
I think I am therefore I am I think. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Biff

Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 439
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I suspect that since the files are already available, he wants the drive itself. I don't think Sapagoo did any deep dive analysis of the drive, nor did he extract a DD/Ghost/Drive-image of the thing either. A faithful drive image is admissible as evidence in a court of law, though deep surface analysis for magnetic traces is not possible without the drive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dante

Joined: 20 Apr 2007 Posts: 578 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think that Peter can access the files we've posted to the wiki, or even this very post, due to the Edict.
I don't see why people are so ready to roll over and capitulate to this individual, who we barely know but so far has not acted very honorably towards us or anyone else as far as I can tell. Yes, eventually we will give him the trussed swan like he wants, but I see no reason not to take the opportunity to try to learn a little bit more about what we're dealing with. I don't foresee any risk that he is going to run and call everything off. What other choice does he have if he really wants it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|